Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst, posits that an investigation into the Clinton Foundation could uncover significant irregularities, potentially leading to greater scandals than previous controversies associated with large international aid organizations such as USAID.

Ortel argues that the unraveling of the Clinton family’s influence could have a domino effect, impacting globalist entities and influential billionaires, including Bill Gates and George Soros.

Ortel characterizes the Clinton Foundation as the 'largest unprosecuted fraud' in recent history.

He suggests that if allegations of fraud are substantiated, numerous trustees, executives, and donors—both domestic and international—could face tax and legal scrutiny from governments in the United States and abroad.

According to Ortel, hundreds of billions in grant funds might be recovered by governments if misconduct is proven.

Public records indicate that various countries and entities have donated to the Clinton Foundation, including Australia, France, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine.

The primary known contributor is UNITAID, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), which reportedly transferred hundreds of millions more than the Clinton Foundation has disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service since 2006.

Other notable donors mentioned by Ortel include the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID), Australia's program AusAID, Norway's NORAD, and humanitarian agencies from Canada, Ireland, and Sweden.

Additionally, private foundations have been identified as donors to the Clinton Foundation, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has contributed since 2005 during a period when Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, collaborated with Bill Clinton.

George Soros is also identified as a significant benefactor.

Ortel raises concerns regarding the credibility lent to the Clinton Foundation by prestigious institutions such as Harvard, Yale, and Columbia University, asserting that these associations could obscure the foundation’s questionable charitable practices.

He also criticizes traditional media outlets for promoting events related to the Clinton Global Initiative while neglecting to note that the initiative has not been legally registered as a charitable entity.

In a hearing from 2018, it was revealed that the Clinton Foundation allegedly owes approximately $2.5 billion to the U.S. government, as it was argued that the organization acted as a foreign agent rather than a nonprofit institution.

Ortel claims that the implications of ongoing investigations may extend beyond the stated debt, suggesting a broader misuse of charitable purposes by the Clintons, referencing allegations of muddled accounting methodologies regarding health initiatives and millions purportedly mismanaged in Haiti.