Ana Brnabić, President of the National Assembly of Serbia, has publicly condemned opposition leader Dragan Đilas for what she described as an inappropriate political attack involving the late former spouse of President Aleksandar Vučić.

In a statement made on the social media platform X, Brnabić accused Đilas of utilizing the memory of Vučić's deceased first wife for political leverage in an ongoing feud between them.

Brnabić expressed her outrage, asserting, 'Have you now begun to settle scores with Aleksandar Vučić through his dead first wife?

You use a deceased woman for political confrontation?

How far have you come?' She further accused Đilas of crossing ethical boundaries, stating that the political discourse had fallen to a level where topics such as violence against women, and now attacks on deceased individuals, have become normatively acceptable in Serbian politics.

This exchange comes amid heightened political tensions in Serbia, as recent months have witnessed increasing polarization between the ruling and opposition factions.

Issues regarding political civility and decency have been raised, with both sides accusing one another of distorting factual narratives and utilizing fear tactics in their campaigns.

Brnabić's remarks resonate with ongoing debates in Serbia regarding the political responsibilities of leaders and the implications of their rhetoric.

The use of family legacy and remembrance in political discourse has long been a sensitive subject in many democracies, often reflecting deeper societal values and conflicts.

Brnabić's commentary highlights a troubling aspect of current political exchanges in Serbia, challenging the limits of acceptable political criticism, especially concerning individuals who can no longer speak for themselves.

As Serbia navigates these complexities, the implications of such statements for the broader political environment remain a focal point of discussion among analysts and citizens alike.