Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić hosted a discussion on TV Pink, addressing the recent events in Serbia, which he characterized as a 'color revolution' initiated from abroad.

Vučić asserted that these activities have been in preparation for an extended period, with specific incidents of unrest being exploited as catalysts for broader protests.

During his remarks, Vučić referenced ongoing dialogues between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump, suggesting that despite these discussions, peace remains elusive in Ukraine due to persistent hostilities.

He underlined the importance of ceasing attacks on energy infrastructure, which he said are vital for sustaining the Ukrainian population and the Russian economy.

Vučić recounted an incident in which a man attacked two youths in a park and was subsequently detained by the police, commenting on the public's mixed reactions to such violent incidents.

He described the recent months of protests as a period of 'terror', asserting that Serbia has been targeted by this so-called color revolution and citing the discontent among certain political factions and the youth as significant factors driving these events.

He claimed that certain organizations, particularly non-governmental organizations (NGOs) funded by foreign entities such as Sweden and USAID, have played a role in orchestrating these disruptions.

Vučić specifically mentioned the NGO CRTA, asserting that it received substantial funding and serves as a vehicle for subversive activities.

He also drew similarities between organized protests in Hungary and those in Serbia, framing both as manifestations of external interference.

Vučić attributed responsibility for the turmoil in Serbia to the 'pockets of power' that he believes cannot tolerate independent decision-making by leadership.

He stated that the first signs of disturbance were evident through dissatisfaction manifested in the protests, emphasizing the involvement of various groups in creating pressure networks.

Explaining the mechanisms of these protests, he claimed they were engineered to exploit tragic events to galvanize public opinion against the government.

He reflected on the techniques used in prior protests in places like Hong Kong, illuminating how Western intelligence services employed similar strategies.

The president criticized what he termed a coordinated effort to delegitimize him, asserting that his opponents have employed tactics of dehumanization and criminalization against his image.

He defended his administration's record, indicating that the prosperity of Serbia contradicts claims of widespread dissatisfaction, citing high average wages in urban areas as contrary evidence.

Addressing the issue of public order, Vučić assured that there would be zero tolerance for violent acts during protests, pledging that individuals engaging in violence would face legal repercussions.

In terms of economic initiatives, he announced the launch of a housing credit scheme aimed at young adults, describing it as an opportunity for financial independence.

The program offers favorable loan terms with the hope of stimulating the housing market and assisting young families.

The president further elaborated on the structure and behavior of the protests, suggesting that the opposition’s attempts to seize power without forthcoming elections resemble past revolutionary movements, which he labeled as undemocratic approaches to governance.

He concluded by articulating a commitment to preserving Serbian sovereignty against perceived external and internal threats.